<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ramblings on Writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/</link>
	<description>A seduction in words</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cathryn Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1062</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathryn Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1062</guid>
		<description>Lauren,
I cannot write until I have a title too.  And here I thought I was the only one.  I don't know why I'm that way.  Maybe it just gives me direction, I have no clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren,<br />
I cannot write until I have a title too.  And here I thought I was the only one.  I don&#8217;t know why I&#8217;m that way.  Maybe it just gives me direction, I have no clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn on the Island</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1061</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn on the Island</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1061</guid>
		<description>Ya know, I read all this stuff about how to write that is written by people I've never heard of. 

Then I read comments by authors I have read, and do like, saying it's all BS anyway. 

Guess who I'm going to believe?

Thanks everyone, it's nice to know I'm not alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know, I read all this stuff about how to write that is written by people I&#8217;ve never heard of. </p>
<p>Then I read comments by authors I have read, and do like, saying it&#8217;s all BS anyway. </p>
<p>Guess who I&#8217;m going to believe?</p>
<p>Thanks everyone, it&#8217;s nice to know I&#8217;m not alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlene Teglia</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlene Teglia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>They will pry my third person omniscient from my cold, dead fingers. *g*

But I'm with you on apostrophes on plural words. Hate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They will pry my third person omniscient from my cold, dead fingers. *g*</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m with you on apostrophes on plural words. Hate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anya Bast</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Anya Bast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>Beware those who tell you they know how to do it right. The people who profess to know, rarely do. 

POV is a personal thing. I like limited third because it gives me the ability to get deeply into a character's head while still being able to change POVs. Some people find other POVs more comfortable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beware those who tell you they know how to do it right. The people who profess to know, rarely do. </p>
<p>POV is a personal thing. I like limited third because it gives me the ability to get deeply into a character&#8217;s head while still being able to change POVs. Some people find other POVs more comfortable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lili</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Lili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>Correction - does not need to be well written

Sigh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction - does not need to be well written</p>
<p>Sigh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lili</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Lili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>First person narrative can get into the characters quite deeply, but it's a bit more difficult to achieve. MPOV has been a standard story format for centuries. Sometimes I think writing advice givers need to read more classic literature. Put the pop' fiction down and pick up a Master. I think mainstream media with its snippets of information has encouraged people to want quick satisfaction. It seems a story does need to be well written if it fits the modern, short attention spanned reader. People don't read for entertainment anymore, and that's a shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First person narrative can get into the characters quite deeply, but it&#8217;s a bit more difficult to achieve. MPOV has been a standard story format for centuries. Sometimes I think writing advice givers need to read more classic literature. Put the pop&#8217; fiction down and pick up a Master. I think mainstream media with its snippets of information has encouraged people to want quick satisfaction. It seems a story does need to be well written if it fits the modern, short attention spanned reader. People don&#8217;t read for entertainment anymore, and that&#8217;s a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ciar Cullen</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciar Cullen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>Multiple POV hasn't hurt some pretty famous writers. Nor has well-written first person POV (think of, well, all of "literature"). I can't outline. I simply can't. I wish I could, and maybe it will click for me someday. But I have no idea what the characters are going to do until I get to know them, honestly. This can get me into middle-of-the-book plot crises, admittedly some pretty frustrating ones! But I'm with you honey, do your thing. It wouldn't have worked to tell Van Gogh not to use so much blue! I just read a blog in which the absolute rule is write four hours a day no matter what (and I blogged on this). Well, the "what" can be a day job. Does that mean we can't write or become successful? Maybe, but it isn't going to stop me from trying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple POV hasn&#8217;t hurt some pretty famous writers. Nor has well-written first person POV (think of, well, all of &#8220;literature&#8221;). I can&#8217;t outline. I simply can&#8217;t. I wish I could, and maybe it will click for me someday. But I have no idea what the characters are going to do until I get to know them, honestly. This can get me into middle-of-the-book plot crises, admittedly some pretty frustrating ones! But I&#8217;m with you honey, do your thing. It wouldn&#8217;t have worked to tell Van Gogh not to use so much blue! I just read a blog in which the absolute rule is write four hours a day no matter what (and I blogged on this). Well, the &#8220;what&#8221; can be a day job. Does that mean we can&#8217;t write or become successful? Maybe, but it isn&#8217;t going to stop me from trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelli Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelli Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>LOL I hear ya. You know, at the Pro Retreat in Atlanta Nora Roberts made a great statement about workshops. There is no right way. And if someone gives a workshop saying 'you have to outline' it's bullshit.(yes she said the word bullshit) Everyone has their own way of writing, plotting, pantsing. 

Have fun writing, free spirit! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL I hear ya. You know, at the Pro Retreat in Atlanta Nora Roberts made a great statement about workshops. There is no right way. And if someone gives a workshop saying &#8216;you have to outline&#8217; it&#8217;s bullshit.(yes she said the word bullshit) Everyone has their own way of writing, plotting, pantsing. </p>
<p>Have fun writing, free spirit! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nonny</title>
		<link>http://www.laurendane.com/blog/2006/08/05/ramblings-on-writing/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>Nonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2006 06:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.laurendane.com/blog/?p=478#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>Oddly, I've heard more complaint about the use of first person than I have multiple POV. Because, don't you know, first person is unreliable (true) and you don't get into the rest of the characters as much (only if you're doing it wrong).

Multiple POV is more tricky in romance, of course, because you can easily "overload" the romance with secondary characters. (J. R. Ward is one of the few authors I've seen who has a ton of subthreads without, IMO, detracting from the main romance.) But I have a problem with the idea that it's a "no no." Grr.

Gotta love arbitrary "rules," dontcha?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oddly, I&#8217;ve heard more complaint about the use of first person than I have multiple POV. Because, don&#8217;t you know, first person is unreliable (true) and you don&#8217;t get into the rest of the characters as much (only if you&#8217;re doing it wrong).</p>
<p>Multiple POV is more tricky in romance, of course, because you can easily &#8220;overload&#8221; the romance with secondary characters. (J. R. Ward is one of the few authors I&#8217;ve seen who has a ton of subthreads without, IMO, detracting from the main romance.) But I have a problem with the idea that it&#8217;s a &#8220;no no.&#8221; Grr.</p>
<p>Gotta love arbitrary &#8220;rules,&#8221; dontcha?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
